Kamala Harris has once again found herself in hot water, this time facing serious allegations of plagiarism. The accusations focus on a 2007 testimony she delivered as a U.S. senator, where she allegedly copied significant portions of text from another source.
The conservative Washington Free Beacon recently analyzed Harris’ written testimony and revealed striking similarities between her words and a statement from District Attorney Paul Logli of Winnebago County, Illinois, a Republican.
In the testimony supporting a bill before the House Judiciary Committee, Harris reportedly lifted around 80 percent of her 1,500-word statement directly from Logli’s submission.
Harris devoted approximately 1,500 words to the program. Nearly 1,200 of them—or 80 percent—were copied verbatim from the statement Logli submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee on February 27, 2007, two months before Harris delivered her testimony. pic.twitter.com/RvpVLZu5wK
— Aaron Sibarium (@aaronsibarium) October 22, 2024
Now Available: Trump ‘Keep Fighting’ Bobblehead
The allegations raise questions about whether both politicians were working from the same source material or if sloppy staff work was involved. Either way, the fact remains that a large portion of Harris’ testimony matched Logli’s word-for-word, as reported by The Daily Mail.
This isn’t the first time Harris has been caught up in plagiarism scandals. Just as this news breaks, Harris is already fending off questions about her claim that she worked at McDonald’s during college—an assertion that has raised eyebrows.
Adding fuel to the fire, Harris’ book Smart on Crime, co-authored with Joan O’C Hamilton, has also been accused of containing plagiarized material.
According to activist Christopher Rufo, who recently brought the allegations to light, the book features large blocks of text copied from Wikipedia, Goodwill Industries, and a press release from John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
In one instance, Harris reportedly lifted an entire section from an Associated Press article without attribution.
Plagiarism is no small issue in politics. It has the potential to derail careers, as we’ve seen in the past.
Joe Biden’s first presidential campaign in 1987 was derailed after he was caught plagiarizing a speech from a British Labour Party politician.
Remember back when the media took plagiarism seriously?
Back in 1988, Biden was shown to have plagiarized multiple other politicians – a scandal so devastating that he was forced to drop out of the race.
You won't hear any of today's journalists talking this way about Kamala. pic.twitter.com/ZLpn1B8xI1
— Bill D'Agostino (@Banned_Bill) October 14, 2024
The Harris campaign has yet to comment on these fresh allegations, but the weight of the charges is difficult to ignore, especially considering Harris’ high-profile position as vice president.
As these scandals continue to pile up, one can’t help but wonder whether this will further dent her credibility.
Harris’ history with plagiarism is becoming a troubling pattern, and while her camp stays silent, the public is left questioning her authenticity.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.