Texas Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico found himself cornered during a CBS Texas interview when confronted about his 2019 vote against permanently banning a state income tax.

What followed was a strained attempt to explain away a legislative record that Republicans are now putting under a bright spotlight.

CBS Texas reporter Jack Fink raised the issue directly, noting that Republicans have attacked Talarico for opposing the proposed ban while serving in the Texas Legislature.

Fink asked the obvious question voters deserve to have answered, “Why did you do that?”

Gold. Upgraded. Buy real gold from $1. Store it in America. Sell it with one click.

Talarico initially claimed he voted against the measure because a Texas income tax was “already banned,” suggesting the proposal was unnecessary.

That explanation did not survive even the first follow up question.

Fink quickly reminded him, “This would have banned it permanently.”

The distinction matters because the proposal was designed to make any future effort to impose a state income tax considerably more difficult.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

The measure raised the legislative threshold by requiring approval from two thirds of both chambers before an income tax could be imposed.

It passed the Texas House and Senate before Texas voters approved it on the November 2019 ballot.

Faced with that record, Talarico shifted from claiming the tax was already banned to attacking the proposal itself.

He labeled the Republican effort “duplicative government overreach at its worst,” an extraordinary description for a measure intended to protect Texans from another layer of taxation.

Talarico also accused Republicans of “trying to grandstand on an issue.”

Apparently, giving voters the final say on permanently blocking a state income tax qualifies as political theater when Democrats are forced to defend voting against it.

His answer soon became the kind of word salad politicians serve when a clean explanation is unavailable.

Talarico insisted the legislation “did nothing,” even though it strengthened the constitutional barrier against creating an income tax and was approved by the voters.

He also claimed he has “always” opposed a Texas income tax.

That assertion sits awkwardly beside his vote against the very proposal that made such a tax harder for future politicians to impose.

“I’m against an income tax in Texas, always have been. But I’m going to be against any lawmaker in any party who’s just trying to do a stunt on the floor instead of solving problems.”

WATCH:

That defense asks Texans to ignore the practical result of his vote and focus instead on his preferred explanation of Republican motives.

Voters, however, tend to care less about Capitol rhetoric and more about whether lawmakers protected their paychecks when given the opportunity.

The interview also revived questions about Talarico’s broader tax agenda.

During a previous sit down panel with liberal billionaire Mark Cuban and Fox News personality Jessica Tarlov, Talarico openly discussed increasing taxes on the “wealthy” and limiting their political influence.

“I’ve told every wealthy person I’ve come across in this race: If you are ok with getting taxed more, if you’re ok with me limiting your influence in politics, you are welcome to join this movement that we are building,” Talarico said while thanking Cuban for his support.

WATCH:

That comment makes his latest insistence that he has always opposed an income tax sound even less reassuring.

Texans have heard Democratic politicians promise that new taxes will only touch someone richer, right up until the government discovers that ordinary families are easier targets.

Republicans now have a straightforward contrast to present during the Senate campaign.

Talarico voted against strengthening the income tax ban, dismissed the effort as “government overreach,” and later boasted about telling wealthy supporters that he intended to tax them more.

Texas voters approved the permanent safeguard because they understand how quickly temporary political promises can evaporate.

Talarico may call that protection a stunt, but working families are unlikely to view keeping more of their own money as government overreach.

Gold is the oldest answer. SoundMoney makes owning it as easy as the apps you already use.